The road to Amsterdamascus

Major Neill Franklin found that prohibition creates unnecessary violence. Picture credit: Cathy Kaplan
An interview with Major Neill Franklin, executive director of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
A conservative, the saying goes, is a liberal who has been mugged by reality.
As far as drug policy is concerned, the reverse is just as likely. A reformer is a prohibitionist whose friend has been shot dead.
That is the case, at least, with Neill Franklin, formerly a Major with the Maryland State Police and now the executive director of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP), the nonprofit organisation of retired north-American cops and judges whose careers led them to see that a criminal-justice approach to the drug problem has failed.
Franklin had graduated from the Maryland State Police academy in 1979 and began working undercover in narcotics enforcement in the suburbs of Washington, DC the following year. Initially, he'd seen virtue in enforcing drug laws, with the genuinely noble aims of reducing addiction and crime. But good intentions don't make a good idea, and the myth was dispelled soon enough. "As time went on I began to see that it was a neverending vicious cycle with no progress," he says.
Despite a growing skepticism, Franklin's efforts never declined, and trying an alternative still hadn't occurred to him, believing that even if the war on drugs wasn't advancing then at least a stalemate was preventing a flood of addiction.
"I kind of like had the impression that if we let up then it would be this, you know, sort of like the dyke breaking and then you'd have the massive destruction that would occur with a flood of narcotics," he says. "That wasn't really the case, but that's what I thought at the time."
Treading muddy water can only go on for so long before even the law's long arms begin to tire. The tide began to turn for Franklin during the 1990s, by which time he was in management, working as a commander over several multi-jurisdictional anti-drug units.
A little earlier, in 1987, Kurt Schmoke had been elected to his first of three terms as Mayor of Baltimore (the problems of which, through The Wire, many UK-based readers will know better than those of our own inner cities). Schmoke had begun to speak of the potential benefits of drug decriminalisation, and Franklin had begun to listen.
The wave finally broke in October 2000, by which time Franklin was in command of the Baltimore Police Department's academy, spurred by the murder of his friend and former colleague Edward Toatley.
Toatley had been working in the DC suburbs along with the FBI, carrying out a 'buy-bust' on a mid-level dealer – a mid-level dealer who got spooked, and shot the undercover cop in the head at point-blank range.
Franklin says that he'd then finally concluded that prohibition was counterproductive after "getting to the hospital when he had passed, and then seeing his wife and his kids, and realising that this was a futile effort that we were engaged in, and we needed to figure out another way and another strategy." There's a detectable, and understandable, pain in his voice a decade on.
He says that the initial thoughts of many police officers who had been close to Toatley were of anger at his murderer, and the idea that they should crack down even harder on drug-dealing. But then he stopped to think about the danger that those in law enforcement have to face – and that which they don't. Policing is an inherently risky job, and its men and women are paid to put themselves on the line for us. But they shouldn't be asked to do so lightly.
"We know that it's always been our job to apprehend those who murder, those who commit crimes against other people," he says. "From the beginning of time, it's always been our job to protect people from people. But because we are now attempting to protect people from choices they make, we created these policies that compound the potential for violence against police officers."
Criminals involved in illegal activity can behave extremely violently to try to avoid staying out of jail, or even to make more money. This doesn't really happen with legal trade. "We don't have beer barons or beer companies fighting each other in the street," Franklin says. "Wineries aren't going at it with guns and violence." Or not anymore.
It's a tragedy that it took the death of a friend for that realisation to have stuck for good, but it's so often the case with policy that it never matters until it's personal.
It was after Toatley's murder that Franklin began to speak out against prohibition, and he first heard of LEAP, where he is now executive director, two years later.
The job includes speaking and writing against the policy of prohibition, and, in an ironic touch, getting involved with drug offenders, such a group of 12 incarcerated teenagers with whom he'd recently held a workshop, in a far more personal and human way than police officers normally do.
After Major Franklin's own Damascene conversion, all that remains is to convince others. Winning hearts and minds is never an easy task, but the most respected critic of any war has always been the old soldier.
didn’t bother the cop too much when everybody else’s friends were getting killed did it? this guy is about a smart as most cops. not very. took 20 years to figure out something so simple. would love to read more stories about the “good” guys getting killed
I did not type the previous post.
Everybody needs education.
We are all students………..
Pretty hard to strategically see the whole battlefield from in the trenches. Harder still to think for yourself when you’ve been indoctrinated your whole career.
But maybe “road to Damascus” was wrong. Perhaps it was more a Pearl Harbor moment.
But it’s not up to the cops to change the law, is it? It’s up to an almost-as-smart group of folks who are elected to office. Who does the electing? The even less-smart voters.
When logic prevails, rather than emotion, only then will things actually change.
But who better as a lobby group than those who’ve been trying to enforce a counterproductive law for 40 years?
Bit like veterans opposing the war in Vietnam, I suppose.
If you support prohibition then you’re either a black market profiteer, a terrorist, a corrupt politician, a sadomoralist, a wing-nut socialist or a fake-conservative.
If you support prohibition then you’ve helped trigger the worst crime wave in history, raising gang warfare to a level not seen since the days of alcohol bootlegging..
If you support prohibition you’ve a helped create a black market with massive incentives to hook both adults and children alike.
If you support prohibition you’ve helped to make these dangerous substances available in schools and prisons.
If you support prohibition you’ve helped put previously unknown and contaminated drugs on the streets.
If you support prohibition you’ve helped to escalate Murder, Theft, Muggings and Burglaries.
If you support prohibition you’ve helped to divert scarce law-enforcement resources away from protecting your fellow citizens from the ever escalating violence against their person or property.
If you support prohibition you’ve helped to prevent the sick and dying from obtaining safe and effective medication.
If you support prohibition you’ve helped remove many important civil liberties from those citizens you falsely claim to represent.
If you support prohibition you’ve helped create the prison-for-profit synergy with drug lords.
If you support prohibition you’ve helped escalate the number of people on welfare.
If you support prohibition you’re responsible for the horrific racial disparities which have bred generations of incarcerated and disenfranchised minorities.
If you support prohibition you’ve helped evolve local gangs into transnational enterprises with intricate power structures that reach into every corner of society, controlling vast swaths of territory with significant social and military resources at their disposal.
If you support prohibition you’re promoting a policy which kills our children, endangers our troops, counteracts our foreign policy and reduces much of the developing world to anarchy.
If you support prohibition then prepare yourself for even more death, corruption, sickness, imprisonment, unemployment, and the complete loss of the rule of law.
Neurotics build castles in the sky, psychotics live in them; the concept of a “Drug-Free Society” is a neurotic fantasy and Prohibition’s ills are a product of this psychotic delusion.
Prohibition is nothing less than a grotesque dystopian nightmare; if you support it you must be either ignorant, stupid, brainwashed, corrupt or criminally insane.
I wish Mr. Franklin and the members of LEAP every success. Their efforts will hopefully help bring much needed reform to our drug laws sooner rather than later.
And it really is too sad that for many people, the only thing that will shake their belief in the WOD is personal exposure to the WOD in some way or another.
A case in point is one of my sister’s. About 15 years ago I shared my thoughts with her about the WOD and its failings. She thought I made some good points, but like Mr. Franklin, she was afraid of a drug epidimic of some sorts and didn’t change her mind.
A couple of years later, out of the blue, this same sister told me she now agreed with me about the WOD.
What brought about this change? As it turns out, I planted the seed, but that’s all I did.
As it happened, shortly after our initial WOD conversation, a minimum security prison opened up near the small town where she worked as an elementary school teacher. It houses non-violent offenders, many of course who are in prison for non-violent drug-related offenses. The new prison population brought many families of prisoners into the area, including into her school district.
Now she was face to face with some of the victims of the drug war, the children of fathers in the prison a couple miles down the road. She got to know the kids, their mothers, and hear some of the stories. Exposure to that was enough to change her mind.
We have had nearly 100 years of WOD propaganda of one sort or another, so our work is cut our for us. Don’t begrudge those who finally see the light.
as a ex low level pot dealer i never owned guns and and i have been robbed 5 times the last one was after i got in trouble for selling pot but this time they got the man who did it i am so sorry to hear about this